Primalsoup

Part notebook, part field guide, part chaos


My Scientific Temper Has an Astrology Clause

Or, how an evidence-based woman ended up checking her birth certificate at 11:07 p.m. on a Tuesday

Recently, while doom-scrolling Instagram somewhere between a friend in Bali, a former colleague announcing she was truly humbled to accept a leadership role, and an aunt forwarding a Good Morning graphic featuring three roses and a sunrise, I was shown an astrology Reel.

Instagram had decided I needed astrology now.

Instagram was not entirely wrong.

The Reel announced that Uranus had entered Gemini on April 25. Or Gemini had entered Uranus. It was moving quickly, there were captions, dramatic music, and a blonde woman pointing at words like DESTINY SHIFT.

What mattered was this: something cosmic had happened, and for certain zodiac signs the tide was turning.

One of those signs, conveniently, was mine.

I did the only sensible thing.

I went to Google and entered my date of birth, year, place, and time. Halfway through, I paused, opened my filing cabinet, located my actual birth certificate, and verified the time.

Because if I was going to ask the universe what my next seven years looked like, I wanted the universe working with accurate inputs.

I am, after all, careful with data.

Google informed me that good things were coming. Career pivot. Public recognition. A new phase of visibility. Thought leadership, somehow.

I did not investigate further.

The forecast was favourable. The session was complete.


I should mention that I am, by every other measure, an evidence-based person.

I believe in science. I read research papers recreationally. I have cornered relatives at weddings to explain why homeopathy is chemically indistinguishable from expensive sugar. I have a family WhatsApp group where I regularly forward articles debunking miracle cures, alkaline water, detox teas, and whichever influencer has recently discovered that breathing through one nostril cures trauma.

I am the household scientific-temper enforcement officer.

Nobody asks me about vaastu anymore.

And yet.

When a horoscope says I am entering a powerful new era, I accept this as credible forecasting.

When it says conflict is likely at work, I dismiss it as vague nonsense.

When Mercury goes retrograde and my flight is delayed, I blame airline inefficiency.

When Mercury goes retrograde and someone else’s flight is delayed, I narrow my eyes and think, well.

This is textbook confirmation bias.

I know this.

I do it anyway.

It turns out my scientific temper has a very specific exemption clause: validation.


To understand how I got here, you have to understand that I am a Gen X Indian, which means I was raised on Linda Goodman.

If you were not, let me explain.

She wrote enormous paperback books like Sun Signs and Love Signs that circulated through middle-class Indian homes with the authority of sacred texts and the page quality of damp railway novels. They were handled with such reverence you would think Linda Goodman herself might arrive for tea.

They explained who you were, who you should marry, who would betray you, and which signs were bad in bed.

According to Linda Goodman, Leos were magnetic. Charismatic. Natural stars. Commanding presences. They entered rooms and rearranged the energy. They had magnificent hair and the aura of someone whose life included spotlight cues.

I was eleven when I first read this and realised there had been an administrative error.

I am the most un-Leo Leo I have ever met.

I am socially anxious. My battery runs at 2 percent on ordinary days and negative numbers if anyone suggests networking. I would rather attend a dinner with four close friends than a party with forty fascinating people. I have spent much of my adult life hoping to remain unobserved.

My hair has never once been described as magnificent, including by haircare professionals paid to lie.

But the book was clear about what a Leo should be, so for a period of adolescence I attempted Leoness.

I tried bold lipstick.

I practised entrances.

I once experimented with developing a signature laugh.

None of it took.

By sixteen, I accepted I was a Leo in paperwork only.


The funny thing is, my childhood home ran two astrological systems simultaneously, and they did not coordinate.

There was Linda Goodman, arriving via paperback and telling me I was a glamorous fire sign destined to dazzle.

And there was the jaathagam, my Vedic horoscope, commissioned at birth and stored carefully for future decision-making.

The jaathagam was consulted before marriages, travel plans, and periods of unexplained inconvenience. It involved charts, houses, timings, and an overall tone of bureaucratic seriousness.

By Western astrology I was a Leo.

By Vedic astrology I was several other things, none of them famous for magnificent hair.

I never reconciled these contradictions.

I simply consulted whichever system was praising me that week.

This is the true gift of pluralism.

Why commit to one belief structure when two can compete for your approval?


Which brings us back to Uranus, now in Gemini until 2033.

I have read approximately one and a half articles on this transit. I understood around twelve percent. I retained only the useful parts.

Then I asked ChatGPT.

Because in 2026, every platform is an astrologer if prompted correctly.

It informed me that I was entering a Career and Identity Upgrade Era.

There would be sudden professional pivots. Greater autonomy. Recognition through ideas and communication. Writing and teaching opportunities. Less tolerance for bureaucracy. Multiple income streams.

People finally recognising my value.

Reader, I have been waiting for people to recognise my value since at least 2007.

ChatGPT also offered warnings.

Do not cling to outdated roles.

Do not underestimate side projects.

Do not assume prestige must come through old institutions.

Your title may matter less than your actual influence.

I read that last line twice.

More accurately, it was the first performance review I had received in years that did not leave me confused.

It was the most seen I had felt in months.


I will not be taking astrology too seriously.

I will, however, be taking it somewhat seriously.

I will continue to believe in vaccines, peer review, and double-blind studies.

I will continue correcting relatives who think turmeric can reverse structural disease.

I will continue pointing out that the moon does not control your blood sugar.

But I will also check Mercury retrograde dates before flights.

I will read my horoscope on Sundays.

I will consult the jaathagam before booking anything non-refundable.

I will privately interpret Uranus entering Gemini as a sign that something good may finally happen to me, despite all available evidence suggesting that what will happen to me next is what has always happened to me:

emails, admin, and laundry.

The planets move in cycles.

My inbox does not.



Leave a comment